|Welcome to All Aircraft Are Not Involved.
Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, make your voice heard!
nothing-at-all-saying-crap.. well lets see:
>>...about a half degree celsius down. (maybe refering to the post 911 flight embargo for 2 days and the lift thereafter, see the documentary 'global dimming'. or maybe talking about a big volcano eruption) and this effect, some scientists want to reproduce. airplanes for example should bring sulfur into the upper atmosphere. the sulfur powder will be mixed into the kerosine and due the cumbustion in the engines, sulfur dioxide forms, like in a volcanic eruption. the sulfur dioxide particles diffuse the sunlight and reduce the radiation hitting the earth. the gas should be dispensed globally along the worldwide flightpaths, and slow down or even stop the global warming. but sulfur dioxide is poisonous. though, supporters say that in such a great height the lifespan of the gas would be too short to reach the earth's surface, there is no guarantee. shiftings in the atmospheare could lead to a nasty surprise...<<[/b]
"Aircraft Exhaust Penner et al. (1984) suggested that emissions of 1 percent of the fuel mass of the commercial aviation fleet as particulates, between 40,000- and 100,000-foot (12- to 30-km) altitude for a 10-year period, would change the planetary albedo sufficiently to neutralize the effects of an equivalent doubling of CO2. They proposed that retuning the engine combustion systems to burn rich during the high-altitude portion of commercial flights could be done with negligible efficiency loss....
...They then estimated that if 1 percent of the fuel of aircraft flying above 30,000 feet is emitted as soot, over a 10-year period the required mass of particulate material would be emitted. However, current commercial aircraft fleets seldom operate above 40,000 feet (12 km), and the lifetimes of particles at the operating altitudes will be much shorter than 10 years."
the guy responsible for the video seems to be Joachim Bublath.
what you mean, propaganda??
just take a look at http://youtube.com/watch?v=zqKPiHMqicA
it's the same vid, posted by a group called volksaufklaerer (~ people enlightener)
they look very sane to me. calling all the tv stations zionistic and jewish controlled. and simply advertising their very intelligent internet site with the chemtrail tag.
High-level clouds form above 20,000 feet (6,000 meters) and since the temperatures are so cold at such high elevations, these clouds are primarily composed of ice crystals. High-level clouds are typically thin and white in appearance, but can appear in a magnificent array of colors when the sun is low on the horizon.
File selected does not belong to one of the allowed formats.
The following image formats are allowed: jpg jpeg png gif
thin and wispy
The most common form of high-level clouds are thin and often wispy cirrus clouds. Typically found at heights greater than 20,000 feet (6,000 meters), cirrus clouds are composed of ice crystals that originate from the freezing of supercooled water droplets. Cirrus generally occur in fair weather and point in the direction of air movement at their elevation.
A contrail, also known as a condensation trail, is a cirrus-like trail of condensed water vapor often resembling the tail of a kite. Contrails are produced at high altitudes where extremely cold temperatures freeze water droplets in a matter of seconds before they can evaporate.
Contrails form through the injection of water vapor into the atmosphere by exhaust fumes from a jet engine. If the surrounding air is cold enough, a state of saturation is attained and ice crystals develop, producing a contrail.
Or you can open an image account and then you don't have to worry about anything. And always just give props to whatever images, excerpts, etc. that you post.
Not sure if this means anything, but a while back I saved an image from chemtroll central. Didn't think much of it at the time, but I saw the same aircraft today, flying below the artificial sky muck.
And yes, I saw the same kind of mucky "exhaust" coming out the back.
NatureisMad wrote:So, what kind of props need to be given? You mean there are actually like copyright infringement things on the Internet? What if pictures found have no verifiable origination/proprietor?
Yay! Pictures in action now.
Is this the picture you had saved from ChemtrollCentral? Google-Earth?
Wow, that's quite a shot. Still, like has been stated, it is hard enough to just identify these aircraft. Let alone someone, somehow, to get behind their exhaust & take a sample of it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest