All Aircraft Are Not Involved

socrates wrote:Re: thank you. thank you!
chief, don't know if u know, but started a chemtrail thread in general discussion at P.I....

Plus, a lot of fireworks here today, at CTC, yesterday.

I feel that my job is complete.
I feel that we really have won, and they lost.

Thanks.
Just hope the rest of you can take the floor more, as I try to wean off a bit.

I know there is a lot now on the table.
But I know you are honest,
and all feedback from you helps.

Just don't want my name dominating as much as
it has been.

A lot of fireworks!
A lot of action this afternoon, mayhem almost.


Peace!

may41970 wrote:Re: why?

I spent a long time sending you that short pm the other day - probably spent an hour editing it. Wasn't it you, soc, that recently said something about how we're coming up on this site? About how we can't give the enemy any reason to attack us? About how we should be like Biko?

And immediately, IMMEDIATELY, after I sent you the pm, you did exactly, precisely the thing I feared; the thing I was subtley trying to suggest that you be on the lookout for. The very thing you had warned me against. You let your administrative duties get ruled by your emotions.

Didn't you say, "Innocent until proven guilty?" what the hell happened? Can you imagine "A Voice" ever saying "fuck you" to a poster? Or that she's banning a poster because the poster had managed to log on, but failed to respond to her question quickly enough?

You're the administrator here, and you're telling people to fuck off?

"Don't insult me in my own home?" I can't believe you said that. Those are almost EXACTLY swampgas's own words at his site. Practically verbatim. Things are going good soc, I don't get it. Why did you mess things up?

You just sent this site back to day one with your posts on the haven thread. You've hurt our credibility more than all the fakes have since the very beginning. They're probably celebrating about now.

You are the best, but I've seen what happens when the emotional roller coaster starts. It's your achilles heel, and it's more damaging than you realize. If you don't get this under control, you will destroy everything you've ever accomplished. Don't you get it? Everything great you've done; all your awesome posts and discoveries and observations - it can all be wiped out forever by one day's bad mood and loss of self control.

Everything you write on the net is permanent. It'll be there for your great grandchildren.

My best advice is to acknowledge your screw-up, admit that you are human too. Explain why you hit back so hard; (your history, etc, with fakes) - and bite the bullet. Acknowledge you are human, that you're new at administrating and promise to try to do better.

You can't ban people cause you suspect them of so-and-so.

I consider you my friend. You're not perfect, just like me and everyone else. But if you don't set this right. If you don't act like an adult here, I'm not going to be hanging around too much more.

If you want to harangue me, feel free. But if you let your emotions rule the way you administrate this site, I don't want to be part of it anymore. I don't see victory, I see a serious fuckup. You're human, though, so there's nothing so wrong with it if you acknowledge it and do the right thing.

may


ps - you can publically post some or all of this pm if you want, (but please clean up the grammar errors first). Or keep it to yourself. It's up to you. Also, I'm tired of going back and re-editing this letter. Maybe my words aren't just right, but if you can't understand what I'm talking about, then so be it. And if you ban me from this site, or remove my admin duties, you have my solemn word that I will never break our trust.

I respect you. I believe you are real. And you are my friend. I will never do anything to hurt you or our cause.


may


fuck fear

socrates wrote:Re: why?
Hi,

just read through this quick, not much time right now.

I thought we were hacked yesterday.
When tuddi changed his name, the friend of the person u invited, when he changed his email, it seemed that he got into a restricted area.

Just don't have time right now.

Just curious how if you had the time to think all this, that you haven't been able to do the same with the materials I came up with on Aubuchont/Thomas.

writing fu is quite different than writing fuck you.

Did you look closely at what ur "friend" and then the friend of ur friend wrote? Did you really look closely at what Tuddi wrote???

Not gonna get into this anymore now, just no time.

But I don't think u realize how draining it is to go through all this shit and get little feedback, little help on the board. Man and nature seems to think I did the right thing.

Look again at what last name wrote.
Look at all the shit I've put up on this board.

f*** last name, f*** tuddi, and f*** anyone who is a fucking asswipe.
Did u see what i wrote at CTC, the questions to Lou? Have you seen the new thread at PI?

I think you are reading more into this than is there.
but again, no time. gotta do something, errands and stuff today.

Sure, you have helped a lot. Not saying otherwise.

but Swamp was right.
in that one way.

u don't go into someone's house and shit on their carpet.

You have every right to think what you want.
But these fockers are spraying the shit out of us.

We don't have time to put up up with shits like last name.

Yeah, he is a shithead.

He got what was coming.

no time right now.
not ignoring ur constructive criticism, just don't agree with it.

More concerned about the shit uncovered on Thomas that you told me to "hang on" that you had to look through.

I'm not ur editor.
I sincerely don't care anymore about how this looks.
I'm looking to accelerate getting chemtrails stopped.

There is no time available for shits like last name.
Look at what he wrote.

HE CALLED US FOCKING KOOKY.
SO F**K HIM AND F**K ANYONE IN THE CHEMMIES' WAY


so again, please, anything to help out with as concerned to the chemtrails- deep sky, chemtrails in taiwan?

Because that should be the priority, not worrying about me banning someone for calling us whackjobs.

look at Tuddi.

These are fucking disinfo c****.

any insights into the deep sky.
jeezus may41970, wtf?

have a good day.


please don't fuck with your posts.
but i no longer feel comfortable with you as a moderator.

nothing personal, just I see ur point, but i don't think u see my many points. time is not a luxury.

Those will thomas articles, books, doesn't take too long to look at.
It looks like we fucking busted this thing wide open,
surprised u are focusing in on protecting last name.

peace.

If you feel last name is real despite him allegedly being friends with the scumbag Tuddi, then I will let him back in.

May41970, I don't think you should stop posting here. All you need to do is put up some Taiwan chemtrail pictures/videos, and you are the man.

may41970 wrote:

If you feel last name is real despite him allegedly being friends with the scumbag Tuddi, then I will let him back in.

It doen't matter what I think about last name or tuddi. It doesn't matter if they're real or not. It's depressing how completely you failed to understand me. So what if you nailed last name? You forget how it looks to new visitors. And if I have to spell it out for you further, then our communication has already broken down beyond the point of no return.

May41970, I don't think you should stop posting here. All you need to do is put up some Taiwan chemtrail pictures/videos, and you are the man.

I don't need threats or ultimatums to prove I'm an authentic poster. If and when I post Taiwan chemtrails pics, it'll be on my time and by my choice - not because I was challenged to do it to prove that I'm real. There's nothing stopping you -or anyone else - from perusing recent photos/films/videos from Taiwan that are all over the net. I don't think it would take much detective work for anyone to confirm that chemtrails are here.

From this point on, I respectfully ask that you keep the remainder of my private messages private.

I have a hunch that we're going to work through this problem same as our previous ones. I really hope so. Even with all this, you still have the best chemtrails site around.


may41970

may41970 wrote:posted: 14 Aug 2007
Post subject: Goodbye all, and good luck

My moderator status has been revoked due to a serious disagreement between me and socrates, specifically about the handling of this thread.

This is my last post, for now - maybe ever. I no longer wish to be a member of this forum, and I would like to have my membership cancelled.

Best wishes to everyone here.

Goodbye, whether for now or forever, I don't know.

may41970

Creative nonfiction should not be confused with "literary journalism" and "narrative journalism." Creative Nonfiction is a type of writing which uses literary skills in the writing of nonfiction. A work of creative nonfiction, if well written, contains accurate and well-researched information and also holds the interest of the reader. Creative nonfiction is contrasted with "research nonfiction" which may contain accurate information, but may not be particularly well written and may not hold the attention of the reader very well. Literary journalism is, first and foremost, journalism, i.e., writing done from reporting, which excludes much other nonfiction like the essay. Literary journalism is a style of writing that combines the storytelling elements of fiction with the truth-telling elements of traditional journalism....


Ethics and creative nonfiction

In recent years, there have been a rash of incidents within the United States that have tarnished the reputation of creative nonfiction in terms of its (perceived) loose rein on journalistic ethics and standards, or its glorification of interpretation. The most recent example of these incidents is the James Frey controversy in regards to his memoir A Million Little Pieces. In his memoir, Frey claimed to certain experiences, which later were revealed to be fabrications.

The genre of creative nonfiction has often come under attack from pundits who believe that the genre is laden with the types of falsifications that were revealed in Frey's work. Often, however, this is not the case, as creative nonfiction writers often work for institutions with high journalistic integrity before, during, or after their work in the genre. It is not uncommon for many prominent creative nonfiction works to even be published directly, or be adaptations of one's own work for industriously ethical publications like The New Yorker (for example, Truman Capote's In Cold Blood, or Susan Orlean's The Orchid Thief). However, the issue of ethics is an important one that creative nonfiction must continue to address as it grows.