All Aircraft Are Not Involved

The ptb's want us to be afraid of ridicule. They want us to be affiliated with crazy tinfoil ideas. Short term, this is working. But in the long run, open-minded people will find the truth. They will see that this isn't some crazy hoax.

That's a good connection made between COSMIC and the ionisphere. That explains the mirrors.

There are three threads on this forum pertaining to chemtrails in Taiwan:
allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org/chemtrails-over-taiwan-t37.html]

depiction of COSMIC satellites


allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org/taiwan-chemtrails-t70.html
allaircraftarenotinvolved.freeforums.org/proof-of-chemtrails-in-taiwan-t99.html



I found a few interesting tidbits to add.

cosmic.ucar.edu/international.html






U.S. and China Working Together On Weather Modification
cosmic.ucar.edu/aware/olympics_08.html

1. Introduction

The 2008 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games will be held in Beijing, P.R. China. The success of both indoor and outdoor events and the well being of spectators during the Games will be affected by weather conditions and ambient air pollution levels. The Chinese Meteorological Agency (CMA) plans to provide comprehensive environmental forecasts in support of the Games. The Institute of Urban Meteorology (IUM) and the Beijing Meteorological Bureau (BMB) are two organizations that have been tasked with the development of such capabilities under the direction of CMA. At the suggestion of Dr. Ying-Hwa (Bill) Kuo of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, CO, representatives from IUM and BMB are interacting with scientists at many U.S. institutions to transfer current techniques and new ideas into action for the 2008 Olympic Games weather support....

{I didn't want to make another post, so here are a couple more links that might help the newbie and fence-sitters to get a glimpse of what we are on about at this humble forum. I wish chemtrails weren't real. I wish those concerned about them like Crystal Rose, heck all of us, didn't have to deal with the contrived ridicule.}

trinstitute.org/ojpcr/1_4samhat.htm

A Genealogy of Climate Change: Deterritorializing Space, Respatializing International Community
by Nayef H. Samhat


towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/307/64

Man Made Weather: Weapon of the future?
Written by NICO STEHR
November, 2000

There's a lot of noise on the internet about the earthquake in China being perhaps caused by ionispheric-based enmod weaponry. The debunkers are spitting out that the following coloured clouds can be explained as earthquake lights. However, folks can run through this thread and see why many might suspect this to have been a HAARP-like event.

Thanks again to Lophofo for putting so much factual information together without a drop of tinfoil.

For the record, about a year ago myself and Basher both witnessed a funky looking green coloured cloud. It lasted for only about a minute, and it was strange. There are also a few other similar images on this thread.




Cloud Footage


Finally, here's a long thread going on at the Democratic Underground.
Rumours around You Tube evidence HAARP caused China Earthquake

Official Journal of the European Communities {PDF Format}

{excerpts}

Thursday 28 January 1999

8. Environment, security and foreign affairs
A4-0005/99

Resolution on the environment, security and foreign policy
The European Parliament

− having regard to the hearing on HAARP and Non-lethal Weapons held by its Foreign Affairs Subcommitee on Security and Disarmament in Brussels on 5 February 1998,....


Legal aspects of military activities


24. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the HAARP programme currently being funded in Alaska;

25. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local and global environment and to public health generally;

26. Calls on the Commission to examine if there are environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings;


34. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments of the Member States of the European Union and to the United Nations.





Parliamentary questions

29 April 2004
E-1446/04
WRITTEN QUESTION by Paul Lannoye (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

Subject: HAARP project and Commission follow-up to the resolution adopted by Parliament in 1999

In its resolution of 28 January 1999 on the environment, security and foreign policy (A4-0005/99)(1), Parliament stated that the HAARP project was manipulating the environment for military ends (recital R) and called for there to be a STOA examination of HAARP, as a global concern (paragraph 24), in order to assess the impact on the local and global environment and on public health in general.

In paragraph 26, Parliament called on the Commission to examine the possible environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings. Five years later, I am not aware of the existence of any such report.

Would the Commission explain what initiatives have been taken regarding this affair?

(1) OJ C 128, 07.05.1999, p. 92.
Original language of question: FR Question not yet published in the OJ
Last updated: 14 July 2004

Question which has lapsed pursuant to Rule 185 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure.

I know there's an awful lot of great HAARP info here, so forgive me for being redundant if this report is already mentioned:

HAARP RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS: A Joint Program of The Air Force Research Laboratory and The Office Of Naval Research

You can download it from my site iseelines.com from the "downloadable reports page.

Anyone who studies chemtrails should be well schooled on HAARP. Anyone who studies weather modification, "global warming" or science in general should know what HAARP is and understand it's operating principals. After all, it is a huge ionospheric heater whose purpose is to "bend" the ionosphere.

There's a book called "Angels Don't Play This HAARP" that is a good source of info. Also, if you go to my website iseelines.com you will see in the photogalleries many photos of HAARP clouds. Look for folds and creases in the clouds, look for symmetry, and bubbles and you will see HAARP clouds. You can watch them appearing and disappearing before your very eyes sometimes.

When the Army Owns the Weather
By Bob Fitrakis, Columbus Alive. Posted February 5, 2002.

{excerpt- educational}

Wired magazine wrote about the paper and extensively quoted physicist Bernard Eastlund in its January 2000 article "Activate Cloud Shield! Zap a Twister!" The article detailed the military’s plan for "made-to-order thunderstorms" and "lightning strikes on demand."

Eastlund managed programs for Controlled Thermal Nuclear Research for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission from 1966 to 1974; he was a key researcher in the 1980s’ Strategic Space Initiative (aka Star Wars). Since 1996, Eastlund served as CEO and president of Eastlund Scientific Enterprises Corporation. The company boasts on its website that it specializes in "weather modification" and "tornado modification" among other high-tech services.

Eastlund considers the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Alaska a smaller version of what he envisions for weather modification. In response to Michael Theroux of Borderland Sciences -- who asked Eastlund whether the HAARP station could affect the weather -- Eastlund replied: "Significant experiments could be performed… The HAARP antenna as is it now configured modulates the auroral electrojet to induce ELF waves and thus could have an effect on the zonal winds."

At the Space 2000 Conference and Exposition on Engineering, Construction, Operations and Business in Space, sponsored by the American Society of Civil Engineers, Eastlund outlined his plan for zapping tornados with an electromagnetic radiation beam from the proposed Thunderstorm Solar Powered Satellite he’s developing with the help of the European Space Agency and Jenkins Enterprises.

U.S. patent number 6315213, filed on November 13, is described as a method of modifying weather and should concern the public. A scientist from Wright Patterson Air Force Base acknowledges that planes are spraying barium salt, polymer fibers, aluminum oxide and other chemicals in the atmosphere to both modify the weather and for military communications purposes. The patent abstract specifically states: "The polymer is dispersed into the cloud and the wind of the storm agitates the mixture causing the polymer to absorb the rain. This reaction forms a gelatinous substance which precipitate to the surface below. Thus, diminishing the cloud’s ability to rain."




eastlundscience.com/HAARP.html

HAARP is a large phased array electromagnetic wave generator located in Alaska. The involvement of Dr. Bernard Eastlund in its creation has been well documented in books and in magazine articles and newspapers. During the period in which many of the books and articles were written, Dr. Eastlund was under a 15 year confidentiality agreement with ARCO (The Atlantic Richfield Company). That confidentiality agreement has now matured. This web site will present information regarding the development of the ARCO patents and the founding of APTI (Now owned by AES Corporation) the corporation managing the HAARP facility. (The ARCO patents referred to in this web site are three patents that Dr. Eastlund assigned to ARCO because he was a consultant. They are 1) U. S. Patent 4,686,605, 4,712,155 and 5,038,664.

There's a HAARP thread at the Randi Rhodes Message Board.

forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index.php?showtopic=2574

I left a few posts.










{was too lazy to fix a typo or two.}

Awhile back I went searching through the United States Patent Office on terms like "weather mitigation" and so on. I saved in text format this particular patent which seemed interesting. Had not been out there recently but just went back out there to see the actual patent and all its drawings. (One must go through a process to load a special TIFF reader, but I accommodated to that, since one must persevere in all this despite annoying obstacles.)

I am not saying (via this posting) that I "Believe" this described system is in actual or literal effect, but the patent goes into great and interesting detail on how to modify weather using solar AND other "energy beams" -- as it calls them. In the years since 1995 when it was filed (and 1998 when accepted as a patent) I do believe that much work has probably been done to make all this process more simple than described therein. "Eastlund et al [Patent 4,712,155 of 12/1987]" is cited as a reference.

Also interesting is that in the preface part, it says "In contrast to much of the prior art, this invention employs only solar energy, earth satellites, remote sensing devices and ground control computers. No dispensing of chemicals is needed."

In "defense" (pun intended) of the possible workers on these type systems' development and/or deployment, it is not out of the question that they justify it by altruistic rationales. This patent mentions such goals as "...reducing damage by bad weather, and improving environment. Its non-weather related applications include supplying concentrated energy to electricity generating stations (solar, wind and hydro), high latitude greenhouse farms, and solar powered airplanes."

My position on all of this is that playing around with the environment is a risky business, if done for the best of "reasons," and if done for malicious intent is beyond horrendous. In addition, the public's right to know and sign off on such things is paramount. Bear in mind that if there are malevolent parties involved in any aspect of this, they must rejoice that math and science are unpopular topics in schools today (I hear, from media all the time).

Finally, I was given something of a feeling of closure in reading the description of "vertical velocity components" being manipulated to move clouds. Surely it relates somehow to what I have seen repeatedly (and been accompanied by a fellow witness who saw): pretty, picture-perfect (I term them "shepherdess clouds") forming out of nothing and then disappearing again as if erased from the etch-a-sketch. Not blowing in from or off to anywhere, just appearing and vanishing in a very short span of time. One must be outside, paying attention, and not distracted by other issues and doings, to observe this, since it appears utterly natural if just glimpsed occasionally (i.e. there's a pretty cloud, then awhile later, oh, it's gone).

As noted in this Forum in 2007, by lophofo, the STAR Lab site is a good one to keep up with Mr. Umran Inan's activities, so we can be kept abreast of all his (official, anyway) doings, and in fact we can see a paper on "Geometric Modulation" just out June 2008! So old standby "Amplitude Modulation" is out! Hmm..?? Ever the improvements, eh? Taxpayer $ at work.

Quote is From PDF Entitled: "Geometric modulation: A more effective method of steerable ELF/VLF
wave generation with continuous HF heating of the lower ionosphere."

ELF/VLF waves have been successfully generated via amplitude modulated (AM) HF (2–10 MHz) heating of the lower ionosphere. Through the temperature-dependent conductivity of the lower ionospheric plasma, a patch of the ionospheric current becomes a large radiating ‘antenna’. We implement a new method of ELF/VLF wave generation, herein named ‘geometric modulation’, involving scanning the HF heating beam in a geometric pattern without modulating its power. Utilizing results from the upgraded 3.6 MW radiated HAARP HF antenna array, we show that geometric modulation can enhance ELF/VLF wave generation by up to 11 dB over the conventional AM method. Geometric modulation also allows directional launching of the signal into the Earth-ionosphere waveguide, forming an unprecedented steerable large-element ELF/VLF ionospheric phased array. Citation: Cohen, M. B., U. S. Inan, and M. A. Golowski (2008), Geometric modulation: A moreeffective method of steerable ELF/VLF wave generation with continuous HF heating of the lower ionosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L12101, doi:10.1029/2008GL034061

STAR Lab Very Low Frequency (VLF) Research Group home page

At that same website, another article by D. L. Carpenter, said to be loaded to the site in April 2008, entitled "Highlights Of RPI Sounding Of The Plasmasphere And Polar Regions At Frequencies In The Whistler And Z-Mode Domains" gives some acknowledgements at the end which show some of the players involved (Carpenter is listed as being with Space, Telecommunications and Radioscience Laboratory Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305):

The work reviewed here was supported by NASA under: (i) a subcontract from Southwest Research Institute to U. Mass. Lowell, (ii) a subcontract from U. Mass. Lowell to Stanford University, (iii) a guest investigator grant to V. Sonwalkar at U. Alaska Fairbanks.

That Whistler article has a link, at the end, thus:

Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, dot Org Link

I was just perusing some docs relating to computational fluid dynamics, AROME, ALADIN, ANEMOS, and the like, and wondering how the 2 parts come together where "one hand washes the other" (numerical weather prediction [NWP] computer modeling and weather mod). Decided to search Google for "4D modeling weather outcomes." Came across an interesting presentation by one Ross Hoffman, back in 2002. Mr. Hoffman's take for "30-50 years from now," eh? Why wait, AER?

"Controlling the Global Weather"

ending with:
Acknowledgment: Thanks to NASA, USRA, and NIAC for sponsoring this work

The company involved in this one is
Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Lexington, MA





Around that same time, 2002, they were discussing ANEMOS as this screenshot demonstrates: