Maybe it's a coincidence, but a few days ago Scott Stevens made an entry which included two stories recently covered by this forum. I'm not saying we personally come up with everything first. A year and a half ago, I was fairly effective in searching out the newest stuff on chemtrails. Lophofo has been really good in coming up with pertinent goodies, especially pertaining to HAARP. If Stevens was trolling this board for posting material, it is more likely he took from Lophofo's contribution from Discovery.com concerning Poker Flats and the gravity wave clouds.
It seems to me that Stevens has picked up on the recent theme here concerning various attempts to classify new cloud types, which actually appear as consequences from the chemtrailing. Hat tips should probably also go to Sno Dome concerning the "circumhorizontal arcs" and perhaps to myself for articulating this new trend.
http://weatherwars.info/?p=92Stevens has been presenting chemtrails as kooky for years. He's talked up ufos. Here we see him yet again talking those up along with orgone. Why can't a sensible approach, as Isard would put it, be applied to chemtrails?
{excerpt- my emphasis}
Are they natural? That is a valid question. They are natural in the sense that they do occur in the sky on a rather regular basis. But, would they take form without the technologies that are presently in place to manipulate the atmosphere? That’s also a good question, and if I am allowed to speculate, I would say no. These clouds wouldn’t be photographed as frequently as they are without the stimulation of the planet’s Orgone energy field, artificial and space based introduction of gravity waves into the atmosphere and the additional host of other environmental manipulations that remain active to this very moment.
Is it time for a new cloud type? Probably so. But that then opens up a whole new can of worms. Clouds tweaked from above, clouds littered with chemtrail debris, clouds created by airfoils manufactured by these waves.
Don’t get me going now!
If you go to Stevens' link, you may notice that he doesn't differentiate when he is quoting a source with when it is his own words.
The quote above is his added to the bottom of an AP article. That is an insidious practice I've seen other disinfo writers utilise. A right woos left troll named Mattes did the same exact thing of late. That can never be justified. Plagiarism is wrong. There is no excuse for not differentiating between sources and making clear who has written what.
The bottom article Stevens copied and pasted mentions ufos and sprites. But the way Stevens set it up made it seem like he was adding in his two cents at the bottom like he had done with the above story. This entry of his had two separate stories. One should probably check out the above link to see what I'm talking about.
Here are a couple more examples of Stevens having made chemtrails look kooky.
Weatherman Claims Japanese Mafia Behind Hurricane Katrina{excerpt}
POCATELLO, Idaho (Wireless Flash - FlashNews) – Here’s a theory that’s sure to cause a storm of controversy: A meteorologist in Pocatello, Idaho, claims Japanese gangsters known as the Yakuza caused Hurricane Katrina....
Here are excerpts from a
transcript put together from a podcast. Scott Stevens is bad news. Is he making money off of this crap? If not, then he must be receiving a paycheck as a dispenser of disinformation. Stevens can be added to the list of arseholes including Jeff Rense, Cliff Carnicom, Alex Jones, Will Thomas and others who have turned what is obvious and easy to figure out into something that is impossible to get to the bottom of without tremendous effort.
...in this way they can covertly use weather as a weapon.
...it’s a fantastic weapon, as [Khrushchev] so boasted on the cover of New York Times in 1960 that it was a fantastic weapon based on reducing the need for conventional weapons for man on the ground. It would be able to do these things remotely. And indeed it’s underway. It’s been underway for quite some time. It’s just been a war that has not been in the public eye.
...When I became aware of the scalar weaponry that was happening in the skies I couldn’t approach that topic without having addressed the chemtrails in some form or fashion. At first I thought it could’ve been climate, it could’ve been ozone protection, it could’ve been numerous things.
...And then seeing that happen over and over I started thinking that there’s something happening there, there’s something there. They’re not just creating clouds. It was too general of an assumption. And then I started making videos of these planes, and noticed in the sky in an around these cirrus clouds that there was an unusual imprint.
...From watching these cameras and watching the contrails you can see if a foreign weather modification program is being deployed to try to get a desired effect in our weather.
...But they need these planes constantly surveying the sky looking for this electromagnetic effect in the atmosphere and then that data is dumped into the short-term forecast models for the military, not to the public. And then they run out to see what is the eventual goal of the foreign weather modification program on our domestic soil, by the constant electromagnetic interference in the atmosphere. It’s an amazingly complex program, and it went on for years before we got a clue, probably since the mid- to late-eighties. They’ve had nuclear power plants fueling these weather modification weapons. It’s an incredibly complex program. And we had to understand it before we could deploy our countermeasures.
...the name “Katrina” was chosen ahead of time, as was the name “Ivan.” There was a plan for Katrina to do what she did, it was simply a playbook in operation. Russia is ahead of us in this technology and we’re struggling to catch up. Katrina and Ivan are both Russian names, and I believe it was the Russians who caused this. This was a demonstration of what they are capable of, generating a hurricane and driving the eye on top of this nation’s hurricane forecast center(which was destroyed),. This was a wake-up call that the Russians sent: “You guys don’t know what’s coming.”
To wrap this up, here were the final exchanges between the interviewer and Scott Stevens. Is Stevens a disinfo spook? Apparently so.
H: If you’re right about this weather modification thing, we’re at war, but what is the ultimate objective of all this? The destruction of the United States as a coherent economy would bring about mass starvation and a world catastrophe from which civilization would not recovery during the lifetime of anyone alive now.
SS: That is the stated goal; you put it very very well.
H: To reduce the population, is this what you’re talking about or….
SS: It’s begun…..it’s simply begun, and they’ll try to keep the status quo in place for as long as they can rather than prepare us for the incredible change in society which has begun. We’re a nation in debt, and a nation in debt is one without a lot of options.
