I truly never felt like you were putting words in my mouth with your interpretations of my article. I think you're pretty right on. And I have been very silent about the global warming debate, almost cryptic, so your assumptions are quite reasonable. I'll be pretty unscientific here, but basically when I said that based on the scientists I have met and spoken with who felt the world was getting warmer, that in no way-in own mind-makes me think of the term "global warming". The term "global warming" itself, has become meaningless, like the words "green', or "environmentally friendly", or collatoral damage". They're pretty much benign. And you're right about the people who see and understand the spraying from airplanes being lumped into groups of people who are also involved in a "global warming debate", and usually a "911" debate thrown in for good measure.
To answer your questions about why I believe the are spraying and who is doing it; like, is it for military purposes-chaff, and the like......well, I believe it's completely multi-purpose.Because electronic communications, satellite imagery and serveillance, weather modification-which I've done scathes of research about-missile guidance systems, cyber war, domination over all private information, biological warfare and the lust for domination over every aspect of our lives is so important, the new cold war has moved into space. That's where we're at technologically. And we also have to consider HAARP, which is an enigma, a chaos element in all of this.
I have a friend in Ecuador who is a very brilliant zoologist. He has studied the environment for 40 years. When he spoke of the earth getting warmer, his opinion was "Well, it's happened before. This is what happens before an ice age". So he has a controversial, yet quite logical explanation, that allows for a belief that the earth is warmer now than in recent recorded history, but in regards to a geological strata, it could just be more growing pains,a blip in our our geological history, as the last ice ages were. I don't even dare discuss this with people on either side of the debate, it seems so political to me. And, if indeed, we are headed for another ice age, there's not a whole lot I can do about that. I can however, try to enlighten people about the new state of high tech science that allows a poisonous plasma shield to shroud the earth.
I do agree that we are not far off when we discuss who is behind this. When I say it's the military, really I believe they are the ones executing this machination. It doesn't necessarily mean they are behind the concept or the research. In black operations there is so much compartmentalization that it's very possible that there are so many tiers of workers, that many are unaware of anything other than their particular mission. Most people involved black operations don't know much more than their personal task. And you know me well, I lay it all on the military, but mostly for the execution of this technology. They are like the worker ants for the academic, scientific and political elites. They have the equipment, and the organization worldwide to get the job done.And they definitely have the budget. It's all our money.
And it's ironic that you posted that nasty-assed article by Ray Stern, who was so mean to me. I just ran across it again as I was checking up on my stats for the new article I wrote. If you read that whole article-actually two of them that he wrote, he uses terms like "stupidest" and "dumbest" and I can't believe this guy calls himself a journalist.
The backstory of his articles is that we had many email exchanges before he came out with this insulting portrait of who I am and what I think. I was very patient and tried to be kind. I kept asking him to read one thing I wrote. Just one article. I asked him if he ever read anything I had written, or any scientific or military reports about aerosol spraying experimentation. And he said "no", and he never would. He kept telling me to read Carl Sagan. To quote this genius, he literally said to me "If they were spraying the sky I would know about it because I'm a news junkie and I would have heard about it". I mean, that's really deep. And this guy is a real "journalistic" personality, with a following in Phoenix's biggest so called "lefty" newspaper. And here's the ironic thing; that horrible article will not go away. It sticks to me on "google" like crazy glue. It's two years old now and shows up on every google page with my name on it. And on top of that, he says nothing and sounds like an oaf. Now, I have to read about myself in articles that were cut and pasted from his, like I'm obsessed, as opposed to "upset". One good thing that came out of it is that there were about 150 comments, and most of them were pretty negative towards Ray and his attitude. I still don't understand why he attacked me personally. I really don;t mind if people disagree with me. For all I know, they could be right, but this was uncalled for, and has haunted me since. As I recall, you also came to my defense in commenting on the article. For that I am very thankful to you.
Now, you do have a legitimate gripe with me and some of my links in the early days of my website. I can only claim naivite on my part. When I first realized that what was being prayed in the air was not pesticide, as it was being reported, I had to come to some of my own conclusions. So when I posted links to certain questionable websites, I think it;s because I was just so relieved to see that other people were upset as well. But I did definitely lack finesse in understanding ulterior motives of the people whose sites I was recommending. You will be pleased to know that since I re-vamped the website, I discontinued the "links" section.I got too tired of thinking I found a true compatriot, only to have them eventually come out with some completely rediculous statement about something other than chemtrails. That's so disappointing to me.
And this guy Lou Aubochon was really man to me, He had no reason to attack me, As I said, I'm okay with being disagreed with. But once you print something tacky, ean, and untrue about someone on the internet, that information stays with you.
So, what I'm trying to say is that you are a much more intelligent person, and more discerning of insincerity than I, and you seem to be able to catch to the trolls from a distance. I'm not that good, so I have to stay guarded.
I love what you've done with my article and feel as though we have another collaboration going.
Thanks for the communications and the kindness. I guess the artist in me makes me a little sensitive about personal attacks, but I in no means have felt any hostility from you. And my mind is still open to learn more of what goes
on in the air.
Let's continue the converstion.
ps. and I too get weary of the crazies. They are everywhere in this topic.