
dave was pro Obama. He was a democrat and politically astute. Remember, he wasnt part of the rabble at FSZ. He was reviled by the herd and even a portion of the free thinkers, some of whom thot his tactics went to far and threatened an outing war between UGOG and MattyJack. I like that BTW. Rhymes with DaddyMac.
To me, what is interesting about the Tea Parties is what they symbolize now as much as in the 18th century, or wtf:
neocon revolt.
Revolt in this country is unlikely but its potential is nil from the left, whose futility is neatly summed up by the reaction to the fizzle on Wall Street Rally of 4.2, 4.3 or 4.4. Whenever the fuck it was sposse d to be held.
The first reule for the revolutionary:
get the place, date and time correct.
RIOTOUS!
Reule #2: dont smoke that second jay before heading out to the confrontation.
And in closing, thanks Sock Rat for exposing my fine work at MLW. I snuck a peak and was surprised to see Mrs. Mudgette calling me a "paranoid hullicenogen" or wtf. Well, I spose she's wright, in the final analysis.
And, uh, take it from a historic troll. There is a process that must be followed in getting banned. You just down throw down some wek schtick about cutting the military budget and demand the comment be deleted and you be banned. Sheesh, man, if that was easy everybody would be banned.
What? You think Jesus just went up and got in Pilate's face and told him to off him?
No sirree. He had go to through some shit first, y'know, betrayals/denials/kkkrewing cocks, or wtf.
OK and I read up on Francis' site about your good work in that DKOS dairy. Very impressive. Especially the gratuitous swipe at FSZ.
Finally, in an even greater waste of time, I googked "Brett Kimberlin" who seems to claim he once sold some weed to dan fucking Quayle no less? I remember that one. Good prank but how is he connected to the Whiteysphere, and how is Larisa Androvna a fake righty again?
See, here I am spilling my gutz as usual, and you simply throw out these names with the charge of astroturff but you seem to assume we know the back story, when we dont.
And I still cant see how to make comments or open a forum on your site. Like, what fucking button do I click on? Or is DOS or wtf?
of would-be anachist MattyJack



I've a few more thoughts then need to take a break. Supersoling stole an idea of mine too. He wondered whether ShadowThief was Jack or had something to do with FSZ or whoever he is. Now Curmudgette is showing up with her blog ethics thing which kinda tries to make it seem that Jack is now telling the truth about this whole thing being some sociological study.
I think this is some warped limited hangout to cover up what Dave was working on. This is some incestuous, corrupt manipulation between all these various soapblox domains. Friggen MeSoc is now trumping up ThereIsNoSpoon's return to her place. Her good friend Phil I. Stine is a Fox News Producer? What about KarmaFish going after Francis Holland after I confronted Markos Moulitsas as LetTheSunShine?
Listen, if you are for real, please start posting at my forum. It's a lot easier to crank out dialogue without any risk of pissing off Antoinette.
Yeah, I'm sure we are good for business here, but if Antoinette doesn't realise that in time, she could pull the plug any time and there we have it, DonkkkeyTurd and SockRat are historic trolls.
Please stop calling me sockrat. How many times do I have to ask you that?
I probably have some other thoughts but oh well, at my forum, there is a thread called davefromqueens4. And for the eightieth millionth time, I love this Dave Weintraub guy and respect every friggen thing he did. I know I got to know him mostly after he died, but my intentions are good and I'm sick of the internet being a closed shop. And I do not believe the hog wash coming out. Not one bit of it. Is it a limited hangout? A way to make us the scapegoats once again? A way to cover up the true story of DKos and cointelpro-like corruption on the internet? As you and Arthur Gilroy says, bet on it.


Another article on the tasing of the white, 72 year old great grandmother (0.00 / 0)
http://jonathanturley.org/2009/07/29/video-officer-tasers-72-year-old-great-grandmother-after-a-dare/#more-13268
Someone mentions an Amnesty International report saying cops torture to death about 5 people a year with these devices.
Oops. Five a month.
Generally unresisting civilians who've done nothing wrong of course.
by: DavidByron @ Wed Jul 29, 2009 at 13:38:46 PM CDT
Generally unresisting civilians? (0.00 / 0)
What, no link? Not likely as anyone with half sense knows you made that crap up.
by: JohnDoe @ Wed Jul 29, 2009 at 14:52:42 PM CDT
This incident is directly related to my point here. (4.00 / 1)
The video clearly shows an uncooperative and belligerent Winkfein. However, as we have often discussed on this blog (here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here), officers now routinely use tasers when there is a failure to obey commands - a casual use of the weapon that has resulted in injuries and abuse in some cases.
http://jonathanturley.org/2009/07/29/video-officer-tasers-72-year-old-great-grandmother-after-a-dare/#more-13268
"YOU MUST OBEY or I will tazer you" is the authoritarian cop rule of post-9/11 Amerika. That needs to end.
BTW, Turley's "a casual use of the weapon that has resulted in . . . abuse in some cases" indicates his lack of understanding, since using the weapon simply because individuals fail to obey command is nearly always an abuse, since tazering is torture.
For attractive lips, speak words of kindness, For lovely eyes, seek out the good in people, For a slim figure, share your food with the hungry. -- A-Hep
by: fairleft @ Wed Jul 29, 2009 at 15:06:32 PM CDT
I accept (0.00 / 0)
it happens. I see no proof that it's a general thing.
If a cop has to take someone into custody who resists, what is your alternative suggestion? Beating them with billy clubs until they submit is not so pleasant either.
At least some of these "failure to obey" types are trying to make a scene. The "pleaes don't tase me bro" dude had every chance to leave without an altercation and chose to force one. You do not have an infinite right to screw with everyone else in an unreasonable fashion.
by: JohnDoe @ Wed Jul 29, 2009 at 19:02:51 PM CDT
ps -- are you Byron's sockpuppet? (0.00 / 0)
by: JohnDoe @ Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 04:44:07 AM CDT
thanks, I needed a li'l ego boost (4.00 / 1)
BTW, I'm thinking I'll start posting my shit over at freespeechzone again. Just to see what kind of reaction I'll get from that misguided, probly on CIA payroll, handful.
For attractive lips, speak words of kindness, For lovely eyes, seek out the good in people, For a slim figure, share your food with the hungry. -- A-Hep
by: fairleft @ Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 12:36:01 PM CDT
just seemed odd you answered for him (2.00 / 1)
If you share a body, at least you make rational points some percentage of the time.
by: JohnDoe @ Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 18:04:33 PM CDT



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest